The Supreme Court and public policy.
نویسنده
چکیده
REVISED SYLLABUS (2/6/14) This course examines major Supreme Court decisions in light of constitutional doctrine and the public policy controversies at the time they were handed down. It then places them in broader historical context. The overarching thesis of this course is that the Supreme Court is a major player in just about every major public policy in the United States. Its decisions regularly address times aspects of major policy issues. The questions are, just how important is the Court, and just how much impact do these decisions have? The course will examine a number of major Supreme Court decisions and explore the political context in which they emerged, as well as the impact they have had. In addition to reading cases, we will read relevant political commentary of the times in order to establish the context in which these decisions arose and the impact they had. A basic American history text book (an out of date edition is fine) that covers U.S. political history from 1789 to the 1970s. (You can check used book stores in the area, shop on-line, or check one out of the library. If in doubt about a book, check with your GSI.) It is important that you become familiar with the political controversies at the time cases were handed down; between 1803 and the 1980s (other sources of information for more recent cases will be supplied as needed). Assignments There are five types of assignments for the course. 1.Briefs.You are expected to prepare a one page single space brief (400 words more or less) for each of the cases designated by an asterisk (*), and have prepared it before coming to class the day the case is discussed. They are like drug tests and will be randomly collected in class, read, evaluated, and returned from time to time. A brief consists of the following parts (pay close attention; all should be done in one single spaced typed page, of 400 words or less): 1.Name of Case (Date) 2.The Question (one sentence asking the single biggest question in the case) 3.Reasoning (a few sentences summarizing the court's reasons) 4.The Answer (one sentence answering the question) 5.Other Opinions (dissents; concurrences) 2.Class Participation. You are expected to read each assignment carefully before class and come prepared to be called upon to analyze the case assigned for the day. This means having read the case carefully, being able …
منابع مشابه
A victory for global public health in the Indian Supreme Court.
On 1 April of this year, the Indian Supreme Court upheld the decision of the Indian Patent Office to refuse the patent grant for Novartis imatinib mesylate (Gleevec). The patent application failed to meet the requirements for patentability under Indian law. The global public health community followed the case closely. Its outcome could affect the Indian generics industry - an important supplier...
متن کاملA Survey on Basic Components of Performance Audit in the Public Sector of Iran (Based on Process and Capability Models)
The performance audit literature and experiences of researchers show that there is no any framework for the basic elements of the performance audit in the public sector of Iran. A framework for explaining what we do and a guide for choosing the right thing to do and dealing with what will happen next. The purpose of the research is to identify the basic elements of performance audit in the publ...
متن کاملThe Trouble with Cases
The recent hearings on Judge Sonia Sotomayor's and Solicitor General Elena Kagan's nominations to the Supreme Court vividly exemplify the enthusiastic concurrence between the senators and the nominee that judges make neither law nor policy. Judges decide particular cases between particu lar litigants, the questioners and the responders agree, and in doing so they apply laws and policies made b...
متن کاملUsing Twitter to Study Public Discourse in the Wake of Judicial Decisions: Public Reactions to the Supreme Court’s Same-Sex Marriage Cases∗
At the intersection of behavioral and institutional studies of policy-making lie a series of questions about how elite choices affect mass public opinion. Scholars have considered how judicial decisions—especially US Supreme Court decisions—affect individuals’ support for specific policy positions. These studies yield a series of competing findings. Whereas past research uses opinion surveys to...
متن کاملThe First Amendment and public health, at odds.
At the turn of the last century, allies of industry on the Supreme Court deployed a novel constitutional doctrine to thwart government regulations aimed at improving public health and safety. During the Lochner v. New York era, the Supreme Court discovered a right to “freedom of contract” in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that advanced the “economic liberty” of businesses to...
متن کاملTowards Tracking Political Sentiment through Microblog Data
People express and amplify political opinions in Microblogs such as Twitter, especially when major political decisions are made. Twitter provides a useful vehicle for capturing and tracking popular opinion on burning issues of the day. In this paper, we focus on tracking the changes in political sentiment related to the U.S. Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and its decisions, focusing on the key dimensio...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Journal of professional nursing : official journal of the American Association of Colleges of Nursing
دوره 3 6 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 1987